World

Would the US military try to attack a NATO country if Trump orders it?

My fellow Americans, I’m going to make a speech. I’m sorry it’s so long.

If I were an active duty officer in the US Army today, and I received an order to prepare my company to invade Greenland, I would call in my officers and NCOs, tell them that the President’s order is illegal and that I was going to refuse to obey the order.

You can stop reading now if you want to.

I was a US Army officer during the Vietnam War. That was a long time ago. At that time the US military made it clear to everyone, from the generals and admirals down to the greenest recruit, that committing war crimes was illegal and would get you court martialed and, if you were found guilty, you would be severely punished. Even if you were only following orders.

The reason for this policy was clearly stated by the authorities: war crimes hurt the American defense posture, even more than the attacks of our enemies.

The sudden emphasis on the problem of war crimes was set off by the national U.S. self-humiliation caused by the infamous My Lai incident.

The most important military alliance in American (or world) history is NATO. Eleven US Presidents have built this alliance. US taxpayers have contributed trillions of dollars and thousands of their sons’ lives to it over the past 80 years. Because of NATO, dictatorships have been replaced by liberal democracies all over Europe and Asia, and Planet Earth has been mostly at peace since 1945.

And now, somehow, we have an ignorant con-man as our President. He is desperately afraid of being put in jail. Everything he does is designed to distract the US public from his crimes. He says he wants to “invade Greenland,” a place that will lose all its defense and economic value to the USA if he invades it. He probably didn’t know it existed until he took office.

An invasion of Greenland will not break up NATO. NATO (perhaps under a different name) will continue after it kicks the USA out of its club.

When that happens, the USA will lose its participation and say-so in Western Europe.

Western Europe is the most modern, most faithful and reliable, the most democratic and law-abiding group of nations in the world. It is also a military superpower, the only one that is on our side.

If our madman President causes us to lose our place in NATO, our military posture relative to the world’s totalitarian powers and superpowers will be set back to the year 1920. Eighty years of American blood, sweat, tears and money will be thrown away by his single foolish act. This would be the most outrageous war crime in US history.

If I were an active duty officer in the US Army today, and I received an order to prepare my company to invade Greenland, I would call in my officers and NCOs, tell them that the President’s order is illegal and that I was going to refuse to obey the order.

I hope those of you who are on active duty will do the same.

Related Posts

The German Super Plane That Lost The War by a Hair.

No-one does not like the British Spitfire. We consider it as the plane that rescued the world. However long the Spitfire was in reality in severe difficulties. Germany…

Why aren’t Americans concerned about where Iran’s 19-30 submarines are? Do they not know these could be arriving off the US coast in just over a week? The USA has not destroyed one.

They have about 26 submarines, most of which are the deadly Ghadir-class subs, known to U.S. military experts as the “Terror of the Seas.” With a range of 1,000Km, these…

When will Iran’s ability to launch attacks on vessels through the Strait of Hormuz be eroded?

It could take longer than American missile stocks last I’m afraid. Iran is scenic and doesn’t lack hiding places This isn’t 2020 any more, when USA still had…

What does Roland Bartetzko think about possible deployment of the US Army 82nd Airborne to Iran?

The 82nd Airborne Division has cancelled all its training exercises and has been put in an elevated state of readiness. Now, some people speculate that this could mean…

The US constitution is a 250-year-old document framed by wealthy white male landowners. Should it be replaced by a new constitution?

The Constitution isn’t biased in favor of wealthy white males, so that is not sufficient reason to replace it. Its biggest defect, which has become blindingly obvious during…

What’s the different between Barack attacking libya, and Trump attacking Iran, both without Congressional approval? A lot of Democrats claim there’s a difference, but won’t say what it is.

First of all, I doubt you’ve asked “a lot of Democrats.” I would venture to guess you’ve asked ZERO Democrats, and in fact got this talking point off…