World

Why didn’t Africans fight back against Europeans during the scramble for Africa?

Because for most people, most of the time, European colonialists were the lesser evil.

Zulus

Take the Zulus for example, fierce warriors of southern Africa. They revolutionized warfare in the region and conquered land left and right. Their MO when subduing a foreign tribe was to kill off all the men and then forcibly take women as wives for their warriors. I imagine rather few non-Zulu tears were shed when the British destroyed their empire.

All of colonial history is like that. European colonialists came, identified groups of oppressed people and sided with them for logistical support and auxilliaries against their oppressors and in exchange were installed as the new top caste. Usually this was an improvement over what they experienced before, although yes a good deal of the previous top caste was wiped out of the process.

Europe didn’t conquer the world by sheer military might. It most cases it conquered by perfecting the act of being the lesser evil. Colonial empires were evil yes, but for most people, most of the time, they were less evil than the alternative, whatever it was. Zulus were one example, Aztecs were another. Not all were this extreme, but it was always something along those lines.


Colonialism started in the mid 1500’s. In Africa it ended into the early 1900’s. It took Europeans 400+ years to conquer some African regions. That is because Africans fought back.

Even with Europeans attacked rural tribes with guns they weren’t able to have a easy victory.

  • The Battle of Tangier (1437)
  • The Battle of Mbanza Kongo (1506-1540)
  • Anglo-Ashanti Wars (1805-1900)
  • Tiv Resistance (1900-1930)
  • Portuguese Colonial War (1961-1974)
  • Baule Resistance (1891-1911)
  • Battle of Adwa (March 1, 1896, in Ethiopia) Ethiopia. …
  • Italo-Ethiopian War (1935–36, in Ethiopia) Italian soldiers during Italo-Ethiopian War. …
  • Anglo-Zulu War (1879, in Southern Africa) …
  • Gun War (1880–81, in Southern Africa) …
  • South African War (1899–1902, in Southern Africa)
  • Volta-Bani War (1915-1917)
  • Yaa Asantewaa War (1900)

But they did? It’s even all over the movies.

Not many succeeded, but a few did. The most notable one being the Ethiopians. They repulsed an Italian invasion in the late 19th century. The Italians were only able to succeed during Mussolini’s time right before World War 2 (only to lose that colony a few years after to the British, not that they could do much about it anyway).

Related Posts

The German Super Plane That Lost The War by a Hair.

No-one does not like the British Spitfire. We consider it as the plane that rescued the world. However long the Spitfire was in reality in severe difficulties. Germany…

Why aren’t Americans concerned about where Iran’s 19-30 submarines are? Do they not know these could be arriving off the US coast in just over a week? The USA has not destroyed one.

They have about 26 submarines, most of which are the deadly Ghadir-class subs, known to U.S. military experts as the “Terror of the Seas.” With a range of 1,000Km, these…

When will Iran’s ability to launch attacks on vessels through the Strait of Hormuz be eroded?

It could take longer than American missile stocks last I’m afraid. Iran is scenic and doesn’t lack hiding places This isn’t 2020 any more, when USA still had…

What does Roland Bartetzko think about possible deployment of the US Army 82nd Airborne to Iran?

The 82nd Airborne Division has cancelled all its training exercises and has been put in an elevated state of readiness. Now, some people speculate that this could mean…

The US constitution is a 250-year-old document framed by wealthy white male landowners. Should it be replaced by a new constitution?

The Constitution isn’t biased in favor of wealthy white males, so that is not sufficient reason to replace it. Its biggest defect, which has become blindingly obvious during…

What’s the different between Barack attacking libya, and Trump attacking Iran, both without Congressional approval? A lot of Democrats claim there’s a difference, but won’t say what it is.

First of all, I doubt you’ve asked “a lot of Democrats.” I would venture to guess you’ve asked ZERO Democrats, and in fact got this talking point off…