Science

Why did NASA spend millions developing a pen that would work in space when a pencil is just as good?

They didn’t. The “million-dollar space pen” story is an urban legend that just refuses to die.

Pencils aren’t “just as good” in zero-G; in fact, they’re absolutely terrible. Loose graphite can short out electronics and wood shavings are a fire hazard in 100% oxygen environments.

NASA attempted developing pens that would work in zero-G but gave it up when (ironically considering the persistence of this rumor), it appeared that it would be too expensive. Various approaches such as felt pens and grease boards were experimented with but were judged unsatisfactory.

Then Paul Fisher, owner of the eponymous pen company, with the company’s own money developed a pressurized pen cartridge that would work anywhere, including underwater and in space.

He gave a few to NASA to evaluate, and when the astronauts were pleased with the results, offered to sell them to the Agency at cost, reckoning that the publicity and sales to the public that resulted would be worth it.

Fisher sold the pens to NASA for the current equivalent of about $13 apiece, so not cheap but hardly the boondoggle the story makes it out to be. And the company continues to market the Space Pen to this day.

Incidentally, the second part of the story – “the Russians just used a pencil” – isn’t true either. Pencils were just as bad for Soviet space ships as they were for American. The Soviets bought and then copied Fisher space pens for their own program’s use.


That tired old joke never gets old and tired. The version I like better is, “NASA spent millions developing a pen that works in space, and the Russians just used pencils!”

Ha ha ha. Very funny. 🙄

The Space Pen was developed by Fisher Space Pen, at no development cost to NASA, in exchange for the exclusive right to market the pens to consumers.

NASA purchased the pens for the same price as everyone else. They didn’t cost “millions.” See Emil’s comment below.

And pencils are messy. The little bits of graphite dust would float around getting into everything. It’s conductive, and it could have shorted out something electrcal, something important. That’s “probably why” the Russians never made it to the Moon. That’s a joke. Ha ha ha. 😐

OP: “Why did NASA spend millions developing a pen that would work in space when a pencil is just as good?”

Related Posts

Why is the speed of light so slow?

I have never figured this out either and the first time I worked out how slow light actually travels was kind of an epiphany. It’s not that it’s…

According to Richard Feynman, gravity travels faster than light. If it did not, the torque would cause the planets to spiral out of the solar system. Is this correct?

If gravity takes time to reach Earth, we should be pulled toward where the Sun was 8 minutes ago. This delayed pull should fling us out of the solar system….

How does a missile find a submarine?

The anti-submarine missiles currently in service are best described as rocket propelled torpedoes. They are fired into the area where the submarine is, the torpedo detaches from the…

If you brought a Neanderthal baby to present-day and raised them normally, would they be any different? Could they learn as well or has the brain changed a lot?

While Neanderthals were genetically almost identical to us, as fellow erectus lineage cousins, the baby could probably be raised the same way. The problems would come during socialization….

Can we nuke gas giant planets and wipe them out of solar system?

In 1992 a large comet was discovered that had recently been captured by Jupiter’s gravity. Jovian tidal forces had broken it into several pieces It finally crashed into…

If the Earth was to stop spinning for a full 3 seconds and then resume spinning, what would happen to everything on Earth and how would it be affected?

The world basically starts over. Plenty of life would remain but probably not many humans. Devastation is worse at the equator but pretty bad everywhere. Let’s break it…