Knowledge

Why are bears the only animal that there is a panda version of? Why are there no panda donkeys?

Because this isn’t a panda at all:

This is a panda:

In 1879 a researcher named Alphonse Milne-Edwards examined a giant panda skeleton and decided that it was most closely related to the red panda, which had been studied since the early 1800s. This set off around a century and a half of fighting among scientists about whether the giant panda was a bear or not. This was eventually settled in the 2000s when genetic analysis proved, once and for all, that giant pandas are bears.

They are very strange bears. They are the most distantly related to the main branch of bears. But they aren’t pandas. The similarities between giant pandas and red pandas appear to be convergent evolution.

The red panda is the only panda. It has no living relatives to also call pandas. Bears have a species named “panda” because that specific species got mistaken for a panda a century and a half ago. No other such mistake has happened.

Here’s a panda donkey.

Related Posts

Do submarines still have a big advantage over ships in war, or can ships find them and launch smart guided torpedoes from a safe distance?

During the time I served, if you asked a submariner what kind of ships did the Navy have, they would usually reply: submarines and targets. During one particular…

Is it better to inflate the tires a little more than recommended?

Will it make the tires last much longer? Why was I told this? Will it also make your tires more prone to blowing up if they are older…

Why do PCs gradually get slower with usage?

There’s 4 main reason for this, but only 2 of them are genuinely noticeable unless it’s a severe case of the latter reasons. Here are they by rank…

Do submarines hit things in the water?

Yes they do. There have been reports of submarines hitting whales, surface ships, and other submarines. Here’s a photo of the Los Angeles class USS San Francisco after…

Can U.S. aircraft carriers get bigger? Say 75 percent or two times bigger and than they are today as well as require less manpower to operate them? What are the pros and cons of this?

Can they? As in, is it theoretically possible with current engineering? Sure. Should they is another matter, and the answer to that is definitely no. If you look at the…

Why do some aircraft like the TU-95 and B-52 outlast newer planes? What features make them so adaptable over the years?

Just because they are big. Let me explain. Nowadays, the role of a strategic bomber is obsolete, as these big flying clunks are really easy prey for modern…