World

What is the Streisand Effect, and how might it backfire on Trump if he sues the BBC?

The Streisand Effect comes from an incident that involved, shocker, Barbara Streisand, aka Babs.

In 2003, a photographer, photographing Malibu from the waterfront, took a picture that included Barbara Streisand’s palatial estate. She demanded the image be taken down, and, when she didn’t get her way, sued the photographer and the website hosting the picture for 50 MILLION dollars. She eventually lost, had to pay something like 180,000 in legal fees for the people she sued, and the picture stayed up

Thing is, her lawsuit put an absurd amount of attention on the picture. And where she lived. And everything to do with her residence in Malibu.

She had filed the suit claiming she was concerned with her privacy. But, in filling the absurd lawsuit, she had basically put a tremendous amount of attention on the very thing she claimed she wanted kept private.

Whoops.

That’s the Streisand Effect – an attempt to hide some information instead resulting in the greater, more widespread knowledge of that information.

Trump is threatening to sue the BBC because they took his speech and purposefully cut it in order to make it look bad.

He’s hoping to do precisely the opposite of what Streisand did – drawing MORE attention to his ACTUAL speech, because the way that it (like many of his speeches) has been cut up by the press was designed to dishonestly represent what he said. Indeed, many of the claims that have been made about Trump saying this or that absurd thing fall apart under actually scrutiny.

Trump is an expert on the Streisand Effect. He experiences it every time he launches a lawsuit against, anybody, that requires that he be present for the discovery phase of a trial. That is usually when he either withdraws the suit, or reaches a settlement out of court.

In 2022 he sued the Pulitzer organization for defamation. Claiming they had rewarded journalists for spreading lies about his russian connections. Well, just this week the courts have ordered he release ALL of his financial and ALL of his medical records, including any and all prescriptions he is on, or has taken since 2017, including mental health exams.

I can see another lapsed trump lawsuit in the near future.

Streisand , by trying to block the public from seeing her residence/address, just heightened the scrutiny.

So. I am sure the BBC has the wherewithal to continue the case, further into the discovery phase than the TACO president is willing to go.

Related Posts

How long would it take China to destroy the U.S. Navy? Aren’t their missiles only effective if they can locate U.S. ships in the first place?

This is the the retired US Aircraft Carrier USS America CV-66, as she slips beneath the waves to her final resting place. She was decommissioned in August of…

The German Super Plane That Lost The War by a Hair.

No-one does not like the British Spitfire. We consider it as the plane that rescued the world. However long the Spitfire was in reality in severe difficulties. Germany…

Why aren’t Americans concerned about where Iran’s 19-30 submarines are? Do they not know these could be arriving off the US coast in just over a week? The USA has not destroyed one.

They have about 26 submarines, most of which are the deadly Ghadir-class subs, known to U.S. military experts as the “Terror of the Seas.” With a range of 1,000Km, these…

When will Iran’s ability to launch attacks on vessels through the Strait of Hormuz be eroded?

It could take longer than American missile stocks last I’m afraid. Iran is scenic and doesn’t lack hiding places This isn’t 2020 any more, when USA still had…

What does Roland Bartetzko think about possible deployment of the US Army 82nd Airborne to Iran?

The 82nd Airborne Division has cancelled all its training exercises and has been put in an elevated state of readiness. Now, some people speculate that this could mean…

The US constitution is a 250-year-old document framed by wealthy white male landowners. Should it be replaced by a new constitution?

The Constitution isn’t biased in favor of wealthy white males, so that is not sufficient reason to replace it. Its biggest defect, which has become blindingly obvious during…