Knowledge

How well would a chess grandmaster from 100 years ago do in a tournament held today?

Not well at all.

Timeless legends of chess history like Capablanca certainly deserve the legacy they left behind. The Cuban World Champion was infamous for his creativity in quiet positions, his sharp endgame tactics, and his utter dominance of his era.


So then, why is it that top players of today could crush guys like Capablanca so well? The answer’s simple: players today are born in a better time.

See, every top player today is born in the age of computers. In the chess world 40+ years ago, making moves was simply a matter of high-level guesswork. But today, a computer can tell you what the objectively best move is.

Today, the best players can simply memorize and prepare the top engine lines in a game in order to win. It’s less about creativity, and more about memorization. I think Bobby Fischer puts it well:

I hate chess [today]. It’s all about memorization, it’s all about pre-arrangement…creativity is lower down on the list. It’s ridiculous! It gets harder [over the years], you need more and more computers.

Just the last few years, chess has changed dramatically with all this computer stuff. If you analyze chess objectively, it’s been a lousy game.

Today’s era of chess is all about theories and preparation. At the top level, a win or loss can really come down to who memorized more lines.

So no, top players 100 years ago wouldn’t stand much of a chance today.


In the 1920s, the most dominant players were Capablanca, Alekhine and Rubinstein. These three legends had great chess understanding and were clearly ahead of their time.

Capablanca vs Alekhine

I don’t think most people give these players enough credit. Without the help of computers, they were able to come up with new, creative and strong ideas that have influenced generations of players. However, chess has undergone drastic changes in the last 100 years, so they would have to work hard to update their game in order to stay competitive in modern chess.

Hypothetically, if we were to bring these players to the modern day, providing them with powerful computers and a good coach to update them on modern developments, I think that they could easily break 2700 within a year, and probably even reach the top 10.

Related Posts

What’s it like inside an aircraft carrier during a heavy storm?

During my time on a carrier, we went through a hurricane not once, but twice. We were in the Atlantic returning to our home port but first, we…

If the Soviets had decided to push the Allies out of Western Europe at the end of WW2, could they have done it?

Stalin asked Marshal Zhukov that very question in 1945. His answer: No. Westerns have a myth about the Red Army being this enormous inexhaustible machine that steamrolled its…

How long can an Ohio-class submarine stay submerged?

The Ohio-class nuclear submarine was designed for extended strategic deterrent patrols. Each submarine is assigned two complete crews, called the Blue crew and the Gold crew, each typically serving…

Why is the F-35 terribly flawed but the F-22 wasn’t?

The F-35 has been clubbing F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, like baby seals in recent exercises. And In Red Flag 17–1 when the F-35 was declared out of weapons, the…

How large can an aircraft carrier be made to accommodate as many aircraft as possible?

HMS Habakukk was planned to be 2000′ long, 300′ wide, and able to carry 200 planes including heavy bombers! While it was theoretically possible to build it, the…

Which US Navy jet was the most difficult or the easiest to land on the Aircraft Carrier?

Most difficult or worst? Almost certainly the Voight F7U Cutlass. 25% of the production run was lost to landing accident. Carrier Captains started ordering them off their ships…