World

How long will Canada make a show of standing firm against US tariffs before they inevitably capitulate and willingly become the 51st state?

Why haven’t the Republicans thought this through? Canada has roughly 40 million people – about the same population as California. If Canada became the 51st state (there’s a good argument that, given its size it should be the 51st and 52nd state and perhaps even more) they would immediately elect two Senators to represent them in Congress.

Canada has a history of voting for laws and social programs that are very progressive – far more in line with Democrats than Republicans. Canada has abortion rights, gun control, universal health care, a significantly higher minimum wage than the U.S., and more (things Democrats favor and Republicans routinely vote against).

Canada would almost certainly immediately send two Democratic Senators to Washington (more if they were admitted as more than one state). The situation in the House of Representatives is a little different. Membership in the House is capped at 435 apportioned by population among the existing 50 states.

The addition of another state as large as California would require a massive reapportionment of the seats in the House. The end result would be that red or Republican states would lose representatives in the House and Canada would gain them. Again, Canada would overwhelmingly send Democrats to the House of Representatives.

This massive shift in power would change the makeup of Congress with Democrats cementing a control on power for years to come. You can’t admit a state to the Union and not give them the Senators and members of the House that they are entitled to under the basic principles of the Constitution.


If Trump invades Canada, it will very likely start WW3. Between the US and the rest of the West (who are nuclear-armed, remember.) What an unimaginable gift for Trump’s puppet-master Putin that would be!

Tariffs have zero chance of forcing Canada to willingly accept third-class citizen status in the US. If Trump bans all trade with Canada, it would hurt Americans far more than Canadians. We would have a recession and work our way through it, building back our manufacturing and exports to exclude the US and refocus towards Europe and Asia.

Less convenient than just trucking stuff across the long border, but totally doable. Marine shipping is incredibly effective these days, and we would need to build some new railroads and pipelines (stimulating our economy.)

Canadians (with a few exceptions naturally) have no interest in giving up all the rights that make our lives better than our neighbors to the south.

Related Posts

How long would it take China to destroy the U.S. Navy? Aren’t their missiles only effective if they can locate U.S. ships in the first place?

This is the the retired US Aircraft Carrier USS America CV-66, as she slips beneath the waves to her final resting place. She was decommissioned in August of…

The German Super Plane That Lost The War by a Hair.

No-one does not like the British Spitfire. We consider it as the plane that rescued the world. However long the Spitfire was in reality in severe difficulties. Germany…

Why aren’t Americans concerned about where Iran’s 19-30 submarines are? Do they not know these could be arriving off the US coast in just over a week? The USA has not destroyed one.

They have about 26 submarines, most of which are the deadly Ghadir-class subs, known to U.S. military experts as the “Terror of the Seas.” With a range of 1,000Km, these…

When will Iran’s ability to launch attacks on vessels through the Strait of Hormuz be eroded?

It could take longer than American missile stocks last I’m afraid. Iran is scenic and doesn’t lack hiding places This isn’t 2020 any more, when USA still had…

What does Roland Bartetzko think about possible deployment of the US Army 82nd Airborne to Iran?

The 82nd Airborne Division has cancelled all its training exercises and has been put in an elevated state of readiness. Now, some people speculate that this could mean…

The US constitution is a 250-year-old document framed by wealthy white male landowners. Should it be replaced by a new constitution?

The Constitution isn’t biased in favor of wealthy white males, so that is not sufficient reason to replace it. Its biggest defect, which has become blindingly obvious during…