World

Do submarines actually settle on the ocean floor to avoid detection as I’ve seen in the movies?

I’m an 8 year submarine officer, Nuclear engineer qualified, Officer of the Deck Qualified.

To answer your question, NO. Submarines seldom settle on the floor except in a very narrow subset of operations.

Why in the world would you want to settle on the bottom and sit in the goo that exists in a silt layer on the bottom which can be many meters deep- clogging your seawater intakes and fouling your heat exchangers?

Moreover, what benefit would there be in placing the conformal sonar arrays and bow mounted sonar arrays into this bottom goo further degrading their abilities?

Submarines are neutrally buoyant and can station keep for prolonged periods so why sit on the bottom which can have many adverse effects to the vessel including dinging the screw and creating a huge noise vulnerability? Submarines don’t usually sit at the bottom of the ocean.


I have experience on both nuclear submarines and diesel submarines, I cannot recall anytime that we willingly put our submarine on the ocean floor. The possible negative outcomes far out weight any benefit that you can gain.

here you can see all the supports the are needed to keep a submarine’s hull straight and even when not floating. If any of these supports are incorrectly aligned the hull can be permanently warped or twisted. This can cause mechanical failure in machinery like Diesel engines or pumps or turbines. If the warp or twist is severe enough it could lead to structural failure. Twist or warp the hull enough and then you problems like hatch clearances being off. Crankweb deflections can be so bad that the diesels won’t rotate. Diesel submarines have to worry about this as well.

Nothing good can come out of deliberately bottoming a submarine. Even if you don’t twist or warp the hull. You still have damage to the sound dampening coating to worry, damage to your sonar systems, damage to exposed propellers. Plus the usual clogging of many seawater systems that are used to cool the submarine and equipment.

Barring any of that damage you still have a huge cloud of mud, muck and sand that you just created in the water. Any airborne observer would spot that immediately. Thus serving notice that something very large is underneath it. So it is all around a very bad idea.

Related Posts

Why is Russia always run by psychopaths, criminals, robbers, or other irresponsible people?

Everyone who lived in the Soviet Union and many today would immediately recognize this brutalsky reinforced concrete fence with diamond pattern. Its official name is PO-2 Fence Slab….

Why is the U.S. Navy’s Seawolf submarine such a top secret?

First I was on what submariners would call a target. And after having toured the Baton Rouge, short of Jesus coming and watching me sign papers to serve…

Will Trump eventually affect America’s standing in the world? As an American, it’s hard to get a read on what opinions are like abroad.

I’ve been following politics for more than 40 years and I’ve never seen anything like it. Up to 3 months ago, there were very fringe people in Canada…

How long will Canada make a show of standing firm against US tariffs before they inevitably capitulate and willingly become the 51st state?

Why haven’t the Republicans thought this through? Canada has roughly 40 million people – about the same population as California. If Canada became the 51st state (there’s a…

Is China good at copying?

I have a friend who works for TSMC. She has an American PhD in Engineering. One day some years ago, I asked her do you think the Chinese…

Israel has lost 3 F-35s over Iran in less than 24 hours. Is the F- 35 obsolete?

Iranian state media reported that their air defense systems successfully downed three Israeli F-35 fighter jets. They also stated that one of the pilots was captured after ejecting…