Knowledge

What happened to all the “flak” shot at planes during war? Did it drop harmlessly to earth? Have there been any recorded fatalities?

As usual, Mythbusters to the rescue.

They didn’t really test this but rather an adjacent conundrum of whether a bullet fired high up in the air might be lethal when it comes down. To that end, they shot a pistol and an M1 Garand vertically.

What they found was that yes, it might be lethal. However, it’s extremely unlikely for it to come straight back down to the shooter—but that doesn’t mean it can’t hurt someone somewhere else. A few people had been killed by celebratory gunfire. They also found that out of the so many rounds fired off the Garand, they only managed to find only one of them in that big open dry plain, with the rest having been blown away somewhere else.

What does this mean for flak? Flaks are pretty much the same. They’re meant to explode up high by the use of timed fuses. Before they are fired, the gunners set how long or how high before the shell should explode. When the shell explodes, it throws thousands of small shrapnel everywhere that can damage airplanes and kill or wound the crew.

The more advanced shells had “proximity fuses” where it used a small radar to detect if there is something nearby to trigger it. It makes them far more effective than manually-set fuses.

So, like a bullet, in theory shrapnel from those flak shells CAN kill or injure people on the ground. And, of course, no machine is 100% reliable, so a dud shell might come down intact and that would ruin something like a car or punch through your roof (never mind a person).

Flak crews often had steel helmets even though they were far from the frontlines and weren’t really at risk of being hit by enemy artillery shrapnel (which was what the helmets were designed to protect against). I imagine they would be good enough to stop or at least minimize the impact of those stray shrapnel (as well as any potentially thrown by bombs landing nearby).

As for statistics? None. It was just far too difficult to tally given the countless millions of rounds fired during the war. But statistically speaking, there were bound to be quite a few who were hit, especially those whose cities were bombed.

Related Posts

Why was the Moskva sunk so easily in spite of her considerable AA defense systems?

Moskva on paper had decent air defenses, but the hardware was all Cold War era stuff, not upgraded and possibly not even working. That thing that looks like an…

Why do US Navy Nimitz-class and Ford-class aircraft carriers have cut outs near the bow that makes the deck shaped like a wine bottle instead of just a big rectangle with more parking space?

Those are not Cutouts. What you are looking at is the Angled Deck. It allows the Navy to conduct simultaneous Launch and recovery operations. Planes can be taking…

What is located on the bottom floor of an aircraft carrier?

I served aboard USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN72) as a machist mate a-gang. The lower and lowest decks are where the machinery spaces are. Additonally, there are fuel tanks…

Why is ‘double tapping’ by military personnel banned/illegal?

In Vietnam, as a tank driver, I remember some action near the Cambodian border in an area we called The Elephant Ear because on a map, it resembled…

Was selling Alaska to the USA a mistake by Russia?

Back in 1867, Russia had two choices with Alaska. World in 1857, ten years before the purchase, Alaska is a Russian territory Most Russian centers of population and…

From a geographical perspective, why is it said that Iran’s natural terrain is difficult to conquer?

From Alexander the Great to the Arab Empire, from the Mongol cavalry to the Ottoman army, and then to the Anglo-Russian rivalry in modern times and the encirclement…