Knowledge

Why is USB-C necessary when the previous USB was adequate to accomplish everyday tasks?

Well, the prior USB cable types really weren’t adequate.

First, USB-A was just too big. And one end of basically everything required it. That’s not ideal. USB-C allows not only a cord that where which end didn’t matter, but also where orientation doesn’t matter. USB-A (and all prior USB standards) required a specific orientation, which is annoying for regular use.

Second, USB-A was never designed for high numbers of connect-disconnect cycles.

Early USB devices were things like printers, modems, keyboards and mice. They were typically left plugged in all the time. As we got things like smartphones, disconnect cycles went way up, and caused issues with connectors. USB-C is deigned to be connected and disconnected a lot more.

Third, USB-A is also power limited for many applications, and was never designed for the sorts of power needs that a fast recharge on a modern phone requires.

Fourth, it’s really not fast enough. USB is (more or less) limited to 480Mbits/s. That’s well under the speeds of modern networking standards, to say nothing of things like SSD drives or hi-def video needs.

USB had an amazing run as the standard port, replacing all sorts of other ports that were common on PC’s before the mid-1990’s. But it’s time is done, and the replacement of prior standards with USB 3.2 and USB-C is a huge step forward that will make everyone’s lives better.

Actually, I have to admit that USB-C is better in almost every way to older USB standards.

When the EU told Apple they had to have USB-C connections on phones, I was pretty cynical. These types of things never work:

EU formally adopts law requiring Apple to support USB-C chargers | CNN Business

But, I was wrong. Forcing everyone to move to USB-C has been amazingly good for consumers. I am now a USB-C convert and I pretty much won’t buy your product if it doesn’t support USB-C these days.

The connector is universal (goes in either way) and supports higher data rates and higher wattage power supply. It’s also acceptably small.

All in all, an amazingly good industry standard.

Related Posts

Why do people think Ohio-class submarines have buoyancy issues after launching their SLBMs?

If an Ohio-class submarine launches its payload, it sheds over 2.6 million pounds in minutes. By the laws of physics, it should shoot to the surface like a…

I’ve heard that a magnet can seriously damage an SD and hard drive. Is this true?

Once, the myth busters on the Discovery Channel dealt with this issue. They tried all kinds of the strong magnets, but none spoiled the hard drive in a…

Do submarines still have a big advantage over ships in war, or can ships find them and launch smart guided torpedoes from a safe distance?

During the time I served, if you asked a submariner what kind of ships did the Navy have, they would usually reply: submarines and targets. During one particular…

Is it better to inflate the tires a little more than recommended?

Will it make the tires last much longer? Why was I told this? Will it also make your tires more prone to blowing up if they are older…

Why do PCs gradually get slower with usage?

There’s 4 main reason for this, but only 2 of them are genuinely noticeable unless it’s a severe case of the latter reasons. Here are they by rank…

Do submarines hit things in the water?

Yes they do. There have been reports of submarines hitting whales, surface ships, and other submarines. Here’s a photo of the Los Angeles class USS San Francisco after…