Knowledge

Why is USB-C necessary when the previous USB was adequate to accomplish everyday tasks?

Well, the prior USB cable types really weren’t adequate.

First, USB-A was just too big. And one end of basically everything required it. That’s not ideal. USB-C allows not only a cord that where which end didn’t matter, but also where orientation doesn’t matter. USB-A (and all prior USB standards) required a specific orientation, which is annoying for regular use.

Second, USB-A was never designed for high numbers of connect-disconnect cycles.

Early USB devices were things like printers, modems, keyboards and mice. They were typically left plugged in all the time. As we got things like smartphones, disconnect cycles went way up, and caused issues with connectors. USB-C is deigned to be connected and disconnected a lot more.

Third, USB-A is also power limited for many applications, and was never designed for the sorts of power needs that a fast recharge on a modern phone requires.

Fourth, it’s really not fast enough. USB is (more or less) limited to 480Mbits/s. That’s well under the speeds of modern networking standards, to say nothing of things like SSD drives or hi-def video needs.

USB had an amazing run as the standard port, replacing all sorts of other ports that were common on PC’s before the mid-1990’s. But it’s time is done, and the replacement of prior standards with USB 3.2 and USB-C is a huge step forward that will make everyone’s lives better.

Actually, I have to admit that USB-C is better in almost every way to older USB standards.

When the EU told Apple they had to have USB-C connections on phones, I was pretty cynical. These types of things never work:

EU formally adopts law requiring Apple to support USB-C chargers | CNN Business

But, I was wrong. Forcing everyone to move to USB-C has been amazingly good for consumers. I am now a USB-C convert and I pretty much won’t buy your product if it doesn’t support USB-C these days.

The connector is universal (goes in either way) and supports higher data rates and higher wattage power supply. It’s also acceptably small.

All in all, an amazingly good industry standard.

Related Posts

What’s it like inside an aircraft carrier during a heavy storm?

During my time on a carrier, we went through a hurricane not once, but twice. We were in the Atlantic returning to our home port but first, we…

If the Soviets had decided to push the Allies out of Western Europe at the end of WW2, could they have done it?

Stalin asked Marshal Zhukov that very question in 1945. His answer: No. Westerns have a myth about the Red Army being this enormous inexhaustible machine that steamrolled its…

How long can an Ohio-class submarine stay submerged?

The Ohio-class nuclear submarine was designed for extended strategic deterrent patrols. Each submarine is assigned two complete crews, called the Blue crew and the Gold crew, each typically serving…

Why is the F-35 terribly flawed but the F-22 wasn’t?

The F-35 has been clubbing F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, like baby seals in recent exercises. And In Red Flag 17–1 when the F-35 was declared out of weapons, the…

How large can an aircraft carrier be made to accommodate as many aircraft as possible?

HMS Habakukk was planned to be 2000′ long, 300′ wide, and able to carry 200 planes including heavy bombers! While it was theoretically possible to build it, the…

Which US Navy jet was the most difficult or the easiest to land on the Aircraft Carrier?

Most difficult or worst? Almost certainly the Voight F7U Cutlass. 25% of the production run was lost to landing accident. Carrier Captains started ordering them off their ships…