Knowledge

If the Universe is supposed to be 13.7 Billion years old, why then has the James Webb telescope discovered a Galaxy that is 32 billion light years away?

A: Patience, young pup! James Webb Space Telescope is not online yet. July 12th is the date when it starts to deliver.

You seem to be referring to GN-z11, or some other ultra-deep field discovery. GN-z11 was discovered using a collection of observatiories: Hubble Space Telescope, Spitzer Space Telescope, Chandra X-Ray Observatory, XMM-Newton, and Herschel Space Observatory. In that data, the galaxy GN-z11 was found.

GN-z11 is the red blob. That’s as good image as we can get.

Q: That means that the light would have traveled for much longer than the age of the universe!

A: You are missing one crucial detail: space expands.

It works a bit like this: imagine holding a rubberband between your hands. At a certain point, someone drops an ant on it. The ant walks at 1 cm/second – no faster, no slower. But while it is walking, you are stretching the rubberband, so when the ant finally bites your thumb 13.4 seconds later, the point where the ant was placed is now 32 cm away from your thumb.

The same happens to light: the light from that galaxy took 13.4 billion years to reach us, since then, space has expanded, and the galaxy (or whatever remains of it) is now 32 billion light-years away. And since the space that light travels through expands and light still must move at the speed of light, it has to lose energy in other ways than going slower. So it becomes redshifted instead: the wavelength becomes longer, and the light is thus redder.


And that is where James Webb Space Telescope comes in: it is specialised in taking very detailed images in the red and infrared part of the spectrum. That means that when online, it can take very detailed images of galaxies even further away than GN-z11, and thus shed some light (pun intended) on the Dark Ages of the universe and the earliest stars.

So perhaps James Webb can take another look at GN-z11, and with the magic of shifting the colours in post-processing to compensate for the redshift, the image it takes may look a bit like this:

But alas, that is just an artist’s conception of GN-z11, and not the real thing.

So again, patience, young pup!


The point you’re missing is that the light that arrived here now was emitted by the galaxy (known as GLASS-z13) when it was located about 13.4 billion light-years away – this is called the light-travel distance. In fact, the image captured by JWST was emitted by the galaxy just 300–400 million years after the Big Bang. Edit: as some have commented, distance in cosmology is a complex issue. So, just to be clear, the proper distance of GLASS-z13, 13.4 billion years ago, was about 3 billion light-years (the actual value depending on cosmological parameters).

However, since the universe has been expanding since the Big BangGLASS-z13 kept receding from us with increasing speed (Hubble-Lemaître law). This implies that, when the light arrived here, the galaxy was way more distant, or about 33.3 billion light-years – known as the present proper distance.

Related Posts

Do submarines still have a big advantage over ships in war, or can ships find them and launch smart guided torpedoes from a safe distance?

During the time I served, if you asked a submariner what kind of ships did the Navy have, they would usually reply: submarines and targets. During one particular…

Is it better to inflate the tires a little more than recommended?

Will it make the tires last much longer? Why was I told this? Will it also make your tires more prone to blowing up if they are older…

Why do PCs gradually get slower with usage?

There’s 4 main reason for this, but only 2 of them are genuinely noticeable unless it’s a severe case of the latter reasons. Here are they by rank…

Do submarines hit things in the water?

Yes they do. There have been reports of submarines hitting whales, surface ships, and other submarines. Here’s a photo of the Los Angeles class USS San Francisco after…

Can U.S. aircraft carriers get bigger? Say 75 percent or two times bigger and than they are today as well as require less manpower to operate them? What are the pros and cons of this?

Can they? As in, is it theoretically possible with current engineering? Sure. Should they is another matter, and the answer to that is definitely no. If you look at the…

Why do some aircraft like the TU-95 and B-52 outlast newer planes? What features make them so adaptable over the years?

Just because they are big. Let me explain. Nowadays, the role of a strategic bomber is obsolete, as these big flying clunks are really easy prey for modern…